Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Limb Long Bone Fractures in Children

4Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present paper was to investigate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for long bone fractures in children. Methods: A total of 350 children with limb fractures from June 2012 to June 2018 were recruited and randomized into two groups: an ESIN group (n = 175) treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing, and an MPIF group (n = 175), treated with metal plate internal fixation. Both groups received the same physical examination and routine medication. Operation related indexes, clinical efficacy, complications, and postoperative quality of life scores were analyzed and compared. Results: The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, and fracture healing time in the ESIN group were 43.74 ± 4.96 min, 8.14 ± 1.34 mL, 5.97 ± 1.88 days, and 55.89 ± 5.61 days, respectively, which were all significantly less than those in the MPIF group (all P < 0.001). In terms of common complications after limb fracture treatment, there were 6 cases of osteomyelitis, 5 cases of skin irritation response, and 7 cases of inflammatory granuloma in the MPIF group. There were 2 cases of skin irritation response and 5 cases of inflammatory granuloma in the ESIN group. The incidence of postoperative complications in the ESIN group was 4.00%, which was significantly lower than that in MPIF group (10.29%) (P < 0.05). The effective rate for recovery condition in the ESIN group (93.71%) was significantly higher than that in the MPIF group (P < 0.001). The quality of life scores after treatment in both groups were improved, while the score in the ESIN group was significantly higher than that in the MPIF group (79.43%) (P < 0.001). The postoperative satisfaction rate in the ESIN group (94.29%) was significantly higher than that in the MPIF group (86.29%) (P < 0.05). The quality of life scores after treatment in both groups were improved, while the score in the ESIN group was significantly higher than that in the MPIF group (P < 0.001). The postoperative satisfaction rate and the acceptance rate for adjacent joint function in the ESIN group (100%) were significantly higher than those in the MPIF group (92.00%) (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing is a minimally invasive procedure for long bone fractures in children. It can effectively improve the operation-related indicators and postoperative quality of life and reduce the incidence of complications.

References Powered by Scopus

SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review

704Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patterns of Injury in Children: A Population-Based Approach

144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Operative treatment of tibial fractures in children: Are elastic stable intramedullary nails an improvement over external fixation?

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Elastic intramedullary nail rocker technique for distal radius metaphyseal junction fractures in children

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical effect of minimally invasive technique of internal fixation device removal in patients with healed long tubular bone fractures

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Surgical treatment of pediatric long bone diaphyseal fractures by elastic stable intramedullary nailing using open approach: Results of a case series in a tertiary centre in sub-Saharan Africa

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dong, L., Wang, Y., Jiao, Q., & Wang, S. (2021). Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Limb Long Bone Fractures in Children. Orthopaedic Surgery, 13(4), 1336–1342. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12977

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

43%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

43%

Engineering 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free