Flux, questions, exclusion and compassion: Collective learning in secondary care

12Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context: Health care organisations are increasingly conceptualised as complex, indivisible entities made up of web-like networks of staff that connect to each other in changeable ways. This study draws on the theoretical framework of activity theory and the concept of knotworking to illustrate how health professionals improvise collaboratively to negotiate everyday challenges and contribute positively to patients' health priorities. Objectives: The aim of this paper is to contribute to evolving ideas about collective learning, change and improvement in secondary care by exploring how health professionals work and learn together and how this compares with earlier findings from primary care. Methods: This study applied a constructionist methodology within the research paradigm of interpretivism. Qualitative data were gathered through 26 hours of observations and 17 field interviews within the natural environment of a working hospital over a 3-month period. The research site encompassed a medical receiving ward, a chronic ward, an out-patient clinic and the connecting corridors. Staff participants included a range of clinical, nursing, ancillary and clerical staff. Results: The study found a recurring pattern of spontaneous team forming and interprofessional shared learning to respond to care needs within the hospital as they arise. These are presented in four analytical themes: motion, flux and the unpredictability of 'team spirit'; adaptive, responsive learning through seeing, doing and asking questions; the collective learning gap between doctors and other staff; and frustration, compassion and the desire for improvement. Conclusions: Health care professionals in the hospital setting both create and experience complex inclusion and exclusion behaviours that define who is empowered to act with professional authority in any given moment of care. This paper discusses issues of power, the particular exclusion of doctors from interprofessional knotworking, and the greater emphasis on questions as the pivotal aspect of shared collective learning when compared with primary care. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing

1576Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work

838Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care

580Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Socio-material perspectives on interprofessional team and collaborative learning

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Organizational learning in hospitals: A realist review

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Articulating the ideal: 50 years of interprofessional collaboration in Medical Education

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bunniss, S., & Kelly, D. R. (2013). Flux, questions, exclusion and compassion: Collective learning in secondary care. Medical Education, 47(12), 1197–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12281

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

62%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

13%

Researcher 5

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 25

43%

Social Sciences 14

24%

Nursing and Health Professions 11

19%

Psychology 8

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0