Virtual reality laparoscopic simulator: Training tool for surgical trainee in Malaysia

4Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Virtual reality laparoscopic simulators were introduced to provide an optimal and safe learning environment for surgical trainees. The simulators had been validated and proven to be beneficial. Materials and Methods: The aim of this study is to assess the performance of the local surgical trainees using a validated simulator and help in the development of a training program using the simulator. Prospective repeated measures study in a single center using a validated virtual reality simulator was performed. Years 1 and 2 local postgraduate surgical trainees with limited laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience were included in the study. The trainees underwent a proposed training module, and the simulator evaluated each performance. Comparison was made between the performance before and after the training module. Results: Nine surgical trainees (eight males, median age: 33 years old) with a median of 5 years of surgical experience after graduation were included in the study. The time to complete each basic laparoscopic skill improved between 26.5% and 64.3% (P < 0.05) while the time taken to complete each of the cholecystectomy procedural task improved between 43.2% and 73.8% (P < 0.05). The time taken to complete a full cholecystectomy procedure improved from 873s to 512s (P = 0.008), and the efficiency of cauterization improved by 15.3% (P = 0.008). Analysis of the various learning curve showed the improvement plateaued between the third and tenth sessions. Conclusion: Virtual reality laparoscopic training should be implemented as part of training as it improves certain skill sets.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khoo, H. C., Chik, I., Azman, A., Zuhdi, Z., Harunarashid, H., & Jarmin, R. (2021). Virtual reality laparoscopic simulator: Training tool for surgical trainee in Malaysia. Formosan Journal of Surgery, 54(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.4103/fjs.fjs_59_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free