Improving citation polarity classification with product reviews

17Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recent work classifying citations in scientific literature has shown that it is possible to improve classification results with extensive feature engineering. While this result confirms that citation classification is feasible, there are two drawbacks to this approach: (i) it requires a large annotated corpus for supervised classification, which in the case of scientific literature is quite expensive; and (ii) feature engineering that is too specific to one area of scientific literature may not be portable to other domains, even within scientific literature. In this paper we address these two drawbacks. First, we frame citation classification as a domain adaptation task and leverage the abundant labeled data available in other domains. Then, to avoid over-engineering specific citation features for a particular scientific domain, we explore a deep learning neural network approach that has shown to generalize well across domains using unigram and bigram features. We achieve better citation classification results with this cross-domain approach than using in-domain classification. © 2014 Association for Computational Linguistics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jochim, C., & Schütze, H. (2014). Improving citation polarity classification with product reviews. In 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2014 - Proceedings of the Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 42–48). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/p14-2008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free