Coaxial anisotropy of cortical point spread in human visual areas

7Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A focal stimulus triggers neural activity that spreads to cortical regions far beyond the stimulation site, creating a so-called "cortical point spread" (CPS). Animal studies found that V1 neurons possess lateral connections with neighboring neurons that prefer similar orientations and to neurons representing visuotopic regions that are constrained by their preferred orientation axis. Although various roles in visual processing are proposed for this anatomical anisotropy of lateral connections, evidence for a corresponding "functional" anisotropy in CPS is lacking or inconsistent in animal studies and absent in humans. To explore functional anisotropy, we inspected axial constraints on CPS in human visual cortex using functional magnetic resonance imaging. We defined receptive fields (RFs) of unit gray matter volumes and delineated the spatial extents of CPS in visuotopic space. The CPS triggered by foveal stimuli exhibited coaxial anisotropy with larger spatial extents along the axis of stimulus orientation. Furthermore, the spatial extents of CPS along the coaxial direction increased with an increasing similarity of local sites to the CPS-inducing stimulus in orientation preference. From CPS driven by multifocal stimuli, the coaxially biased spread was also found in cortical regions in the periphery, albeit reduced in degree, and was invariant to a varying degree of radial relationship between stimuli and RF positions of local sites, rejecting radial bias as an origin of coaxial anisotropy. Our findings provide a bridge between the anatomical anisotropy seen in animal visual cortex and a possible network property supporting spatial contextual effects in human visual perception. © 2013 the authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, S. H., Cha, K., & Lee, S. H. (2013). Coaxial anisotropy of cortical point spread in human visual areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(3), 1143–1156. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2404-12.2013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free