Paradigm Wars Revisited: A Cartography of Graduate Research in the Field of Education (1980–2010)

41Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Education entails conflicting perspectives about its subject matter. In the late 1980s, the conflict developed into a war between interpretive and causal paradigms. Did the confrontation result in a balance between these warring sides? We use text analysis to identify research trends in 137,024 dissertation abstracts from 1980 to 2010 and relate these to students’ academic employment outcomes. Topics associated with the interpretive approach rose in popularity, while the outcomes-oriented paradigm declined. Academic employment remained stably associated with topics in the interpretive approach, but their effect is moderated by the prestige of the students’ institutions. The relation between topic popularity and employability provides insight into field change and how the benefits of cultural shifts fall along the lines of institutional power.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Munoz-Najar Galvez, S., Heiberger, R., & McFarland, D. (2020). Paradigm Wars Revisited: A Cartography of Graduate Research in the Field of Education (1980–2010). American Educational Research Journal, 57(2), 612–652. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219860511

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free