Hysterical methodologies in the arts: Rising in revolt

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Hysteria is alive and well in our present time and is apparently spreading contagiously: especially the second decade of the twenty-first century has displayed an ever-increasing interest in the term. A quick Google search opens the gates to sheer endless swathes of discussions on hysteria, covering almost every aspect of public discourses. The arts-as it is often in such cases-seem conspicuously involved in and engaged with this hysterical discourse. Surprisingly, while the strong academic interest in hysteria throughout the twentieth century and most prominently at the turn of the century is well known and much discussed, the study of how these discourses have continued well into twenty-first-century art practices, is largely pressing on a blind spot. It is the aim of this volume to illustrate how hysteria was already well established within the arts alongside and at times even separately from the much-covered medical studies, and reveal how those current artistic practices very much continue a century spanning cross-fertilization between hysteria and the arts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Braun, J. (2021). Hysterical methodologies in the arts: Rising in revolt. Hysterical Methodologies in the Arts: Rising in Revolt (pp. 1–380). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66360-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free