Conceptualizing the interaction of Buddhism and Daoism in the Tang dynasty: Inner cultivation and outer authority in the Daode Jing commentaries of Cheng Xuanying and Li Rong

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper takes the different interpretations of one and the same sentences in the Daode jing as “inner cultivation” or “worldly power” respectively, in the commentaries of two closely related early Tang Daoist authors, Cheng Xuanying and Li Rong, as a starting point to approach the question of interaction of Buddhism and Daoism from a new angle. Instead of trying to pinpoint influences, origins, and derivatives, I propose to delineate philosophical discourses that cross the boundaries of the three teachings. Parallel excerpts from both commentaries show how Cheng reads the Daode jing as a guidebook for cultivation, and how Li Rong reads it as a guideline for governing. I argue that the differences could be read as the authors’ participation in different philosophical discourses, and I will show, for the case of Cheng Xuanying, how terminological overlap with contemporary Buddhist authors indicates that Buddhists and Daoists both participated in the discourse on inner cultivation with commentaries to their respective sacred scriptures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Assandri, F. (2019). Conceptualizing the interaction of Buddhism and Daoism in the Tang dynasty: Inner cultivation and outer authority in the Daode Jing commentaries of Cheng Xuanying and Li Rong. Religions, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10010066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free