Within-trial contrast: When you see it and when you don't

14Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Within-trial contrast occurs when a discriminative stimulus that is preceded by a relatively aversive event is preferred over another that is preceded by a less aversive event. Recent failures to replicate (Arantes & Grace, 2008; Vasconcelos, Urcuioli, & Lionello-DeNolf, 2007) may allow us to identify factors that may be responsible. In the case of Vasconcelos et al., it is likely that insufficient training was provided (often 35-65 sessions are required). In the case of Arantes and Grace (Experiment 2), these pigeons had been involved in prior experiments involving lean schedules of reinforcement, and we find that prior experience with lean (relatively aversive) schedules appears to reduce the presumed aversiveness of the many-peck requirement, thus obviating the contrast effect. Finally, in the case of Vasconcelos and Urcuioli (2008), although the contrast effect with a simultaneous discrimination was not reliable, it was not reliably smaller than with a successive discrimination that did show a reliable effect, and the contrast effect was also similar in magnitude to a reliable effect reported by Kacelnik and Marsh (2002). Thus, although there have been several failures to replicate the original effects reported by Clement, Feltus, Kaiser, and Zentall (2000), insufficient training, prior history with lean schedules of reinforcement, and low statistical power may have been responsible for those failures. Copyright 2008 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group

769Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Selective attention in animal discrimination learning

239Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

"Work ethic" in pigeons: Reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward

135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Preference for rewards that follow greater effort and greater delay

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How costs affect preferences: Experiments on state dependence, hedonic state and within-trial contrast in starlings

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zentall, T. R. (2008, February). Within-trial contrast: When you see it and when you don’t. Learning and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.36.1.19

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

63%

Researcher 3

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 9

56%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

25%

Neuroscience 2

13%

Engineering 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free