Modeling Practices and “Tradition”

  • Kurz-Milcke E
  • Martignon L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The question is posed whether the concept of tradition can enhance our in-depth understanding of scientific modeling and models. We present a progression of uses that the concept has found in the study of science, broadly conceived. From there we take a fresh look at our case study of linear models in judgment and decision making research. We distinguish two traditions in this research area, a ratiomorphic tradition and a paramorphic tradition. We show how the linear regression model was crucial to the inception of these traditions but not to their continuation. Following Galison's example, we also search out connective areas between the two traditions. These "trading zones" can be found in close proximity to computer and (Monte Carlo) simulations, in particular. Finally, a tradition is also an abstraction, which in the end opens the possibility of using our understanding of modeling to enhance our understanding of the concept of tradition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kurz-Milcke, E., & Martignon, L. (2002). Modeling Practices and “Tradition.” In Model-Based Reasoning (pp. 127–146). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free