Crime and punishment and corruption: Who needs "untouchables?"

14Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Becker's result that fines should be maximized is also applicable to some social environments where law enforcers are corrupt. If the regulated activity is legal, the principal may efficiently deter crime without an anti-corruption unit. An opportunistic anti-corruption unit, even when corrupt, becomes useful for the principal when the activity is illegal, since the principal's goal of maximizing fines motivates the unit to collect bribes from the enforcer, which subsequently induces the enforcer to be nearly completely honest, minimizing corruption. Therefore, we show that there is not necessarily an infinite regress originating with the puzzle of who polices the police. © 2007 Blackwell Publishing, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silva, E. C. D., Kahn, C. M., & Xie, Z. (2007). Crime and punishment and corruption: Who needs “untouchables?” Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2007.00298.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free