Knowledge-based 3D reconstruction of the right ventricle: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease

7Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: Assessment of right ventricular (RV) function is a challenge, especially in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). The aim of the present study is to assess whether knowledgebased RV reconstruction, used in the everyday practice of an echo-lab for adult CHD in a tertiary referral center, is accurate when compared to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination. Subjects and methods: Adult patients who would undergo CMR for assessment of the RV were asked to undergo an echo of the heart for further knowledge-based reconstruction (KBR). Echocardiographic images were acquired in standard views using a predefined imaging protocol. RV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) calculated using knowledge-based technology were compared with the CMR data of the same patient. Results: Nineteen consecutive patients with congenital right heart disease were studied. Median age of the patients was 28 years (range 46 years). Reconstruction was possible in 16 out of 19 patients (85%). RV volumes assessed with this new method were smaller than with CMR. Indexed end diastolic volumes were 114G17 ml vs 121G19 ml, P!0.05 and EFs were 45G8% vs 47G9%, P<0.05 respectively. The correlation between themethodswas good with an intraclass correlation of 0.84 for EDV and 0.89 for EF, P value !0.001 in both cases. Conclusion: KBR enables reliable measurement of RVs in patients with CHDs and can be used in clinical practice for analysis of volumes and EFs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trzebiatowska-Krzynska, A., Driessen, M., Sieswerda, G. T., Wallby, L., Swahn, E., & Meijboom, F. (2015). Knowledge-based 3D reconstruction of the right ventricle: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease. Echo Research and Practice, 2(4), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-15-0029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free