Free Breakfast and Taco Trucks: Case Studies of Food as Rhetorical Homology in Political Discourse

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter examines examples from the last half century of food as a rhetorical homology—equating food culture and activism and political discourse. The Black Panther Party’s Free Breakfast for Children Program is compared to the contemporary indigenous group the I-Collective, whose identity and activism feature food-focused content both virtually and in person. The two case studies illuminate the power of food as a broader rhetorical tool brandished today by activists and politicians alike. While food has long been used as a political tool, the Black Panther Party’s Free Breakfast for Children Program is one of the most potent examples of food involving explicit political discourse. Their 1969 national anti-hunger initiative began as a way to make a positive difference in the lives of marginalised children, but also functioned to communicate values, intention, and political ideology, linking discourses and creating what Barry Brummett called a “rhetorical homology”. With the rising influence of social media, and the popularity of food on these platforms we see this happening again in modern discourse. The indigenous activist group I-Collective is a contemporary example of a group using food as political rhetoric in a similarly explicit way as did the Black Panther Party a half century earlier.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cope, S. (2022). Free Breakfast and Taco Trucks: Case Studies of Food as Rhetorical Homology in Political Discourse. In Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress (Vol. 19, pp. 101–112). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81115-0_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free