Induction versus Popper: Substance versus semantics

38Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article reviews concepts of classical logic and induction, with special attention to the controversies surrounding Popperian claims that induction is impossible and does not exist. I argue that some of the controversy is semantic, and hence Popperian criticisms of induction must be translated carefully into ordinary language to be appreciated by inductively oriented epidemiologists. With this translation, the substance of the debate is not whether induction is possible (it is) or exists (it does), but whether and how we should employ probabilistic reasoning about hypotheses in epidemiological inference.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greenland, S. (1998). Induction versus Popper: Substance versus semantics. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/27.4.543

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free