Valuing visitors’ knowledge: the experience of Association Traces at the crossroads between science communication, participatory activities and social inclusion

4Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this “practice insight” we present a series of experiences run by Association Traces, injecting participatory approaches into science engagement activities by valuing the knowledge of the public rather than focusing on their ignorance. Starting from the observation that a sort of hybridization is occurring between cultural activities and public engagement with science on one side, and co-creation and participatory activities on the other, we provide some insight on the features of each approach. Examples are then used to highlight the potential value of this hybridization: as a way of making participatory activity more recognizable and accessible to a wide audience; to ensure that scientists have a professional interest in engaging in the communication activity; to raise a sense of ownership and empowerment in the audience, etc. These examples will eventually show that participation may lead to science communication practices that are socially-inclusive and/or productive for research, and ideally both.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Merzagora, M., Aguirre, C., Boniface, P., Bricout, C., & Martineau, C. (2022). Valuing visitors’ knowledge: the experience of Association Traces at the crossroads between science communication, participatory activities and social inclusion. Journal of Science Communication, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.21020802

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free