Models Calibration and Evaluation

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Calibration of crop model is standard practice, and it involves estimation of crop parameters based upon observed field data. It is the process of estimation of unknown parameters using practical observations. It is generally carried out manually by adjusting the parameters of the model. It consists of choosing the accurate numbers of coefficients that play a significant role in the adjustment of soil nitrogen, soil organic carbon, soil phosphorus, crop growth, phenological development, biomass accumulation, dry-matter partitioning, nutrients uptake, grain dry weight, grain numbers, grain yield, grain nitrogen (N) at maturity and protein content. A minimum data set (MDS) is required for the calibration of the model. A number of different steps could be used to calibrate the crop model. The initial step involves running of the model with default crop parameters and comparison of simulation outcomes with the observed data set. Afterwards, crop parameters are adjusted to have good agreement with observed and simulated data. It starts with phenology, then vegetative growth and biomass, afterwards yield components and finally yield. Optimization tools such as generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) can be used for the calibration. Finally, evaluation of models needs to be performed with independent data set. The quantification of calibration and evaluation goodness should be evaluated by different skill scores such as root-mean-squared error (RMSE)/root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), relative RMSE (RRMSE) or normalized objective function (NOF), root-mean-square deviation-systematic error (RMSDse), root-mean-square deviation-non-systematic error (RMSDnse), mean absolute error (MAE), mean bias error (ME), coefficient of determination (R2), Nash-Sutcliffe modelling efficiency (EF) test, maximum difference (MD) and D index (index of agreement). These skill scores confirm the calibrated model performances under different sets of scenarios.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmed, M., Ahmad, S., Raza, M. A., Kumar, U., Ansar, M., Shah, G. A., … Seidel, S. (2020). Models Calibration and Evaluation. In Systems Modeling (pp. 151–178). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4728-7_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free