In this chapter, I investigate through a public good in rural Colombia how different institutional arrangements, particularly different external regulations, with a common characteristic–an external regulator with a weak enforcement capacity–derive into different contributions and compliances. I tested two monetary regulations and found that high penalties very often do more harm than good. I also found that low penalties and public and private reminders were very effective at increasing cooperation and rule compliance.
CITATION STYLE
Lopez, M. C. (2013). Conservation of natural resources: Which matters - Having a regulation or the size of the penalty imposed? In Human-Environment Interactions: Current and Future Directions (pp. 235–250). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4780-7_10
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.