Utilization, access and satisfaction with primary care among people with spinal cord injuries: A comparison of three countries

82Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Study design: Cross-sectional; survey. Objectives: To describe the utilization, accessibility and satisfaction of primary and preventive health-care services to individuals with long-term spinal cord injuries, and compare results among three countries: the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Setting: The Canadian sample was obtained from the Canadian Paraplegic Association - Ontario and Manitoba Divisions. The British sample was recruited from the Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre in Southport and National Spinal Injuries Centre at Stoke Mandeville Hospital in Aylesbury. The American sample was recruited through Craig Hospital in Englewood, CO, USA. Method: A total sample of 373 individuals aging with a spinal cord injury participated in a mailed survey. The Health Care Questionnaire was used to measure utilization, access and satisfaction with primary care and preventive services. Results: In total, 93% of individuals reported having a family doctor, 63% had a spinal injuries specialist and 56% had both a family doctor and spinal injuries specialist. Considerable duplication of services occurred for general medical and preventive services, although lifestyle and emotional issues were not addressed for over 75% of the participants. Significant differences were found in utilization among Canada, US and UK, with Canadians most likely to receive health care from family physicians and Americans most likely to receive care from specialists. Access to and satisfaction with health services was not significantly different among countries. Conclusion: People with long-standing spinal cord injuries develop complex maps by which they seek out appropriate primary health-care and preventive services. Given the differences among countries, it is clear that the health delivery model plays an important role in how and where individuals receive health services. © 2007 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Health promotion for people with disabilities: The emerging paradigm shift from disability prevention to prevention of secondary conditions

336Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Utilization of health services following spinal cord injury: A 6-year follow-up study

222Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Common concerns amid diverse systems: Health care experiences in five countries

205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Models for Integrating Rehabilitation and Primary Care: A Scoping Study

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Health care utilization and barriers experienced by individuals with spinal cord injury

93Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Unmet health care needs of people with disabilities: Population level evidence

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Donnelly, C., McColl, M. A., Charlifue, S., Glass, C., O’Brien, P., Savic, G., & Smith, K. (2007). Utilization, access and satisfaction with primary care among people with spinal cord injuries: A comparison of three countries. Spinal Cord, 45(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101933

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

58%

Researcher 17

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 23

48%

Social Sciences 10

21%

Nursing and Health Professions 9

19%

Psychology 6

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free