Communal Feelings and Implicit Self-Knowledge. Hermann Schmalenbach on the Nature of the Social Bond

6Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is widely accepted in the received literature that the decisive feature in the constitution of community, and indeed its ontological core, is some sort of collective acknowledgement of the community, and mutual recognition between the members. A prominent version of this claim is that communities exist insofar as their members believe they exist, and that the communal bond is mutual sympathy. Yet this view is at odds with rather obvious facts: community members often dislike each other, and are far from acknowledging the existence of any such bond. How can these phenomena be accommodated in the view that community is a matter of attitude rather than of brute objective facts? This paper suggests an answer that is inspired by the work of the German phenomenologist Hermann Schmalenbach (1885–1950). The claim is that the basic communal ties are plural implicit self-knowledge of the participants as members of the community. Implicit self-knowledge is often not reflectively transparent. Community members are plurally self-aware without thinking of themselves in “we”-terms. Where individuals consciously conceive of themselves as members, the community is turned into what Schmalenbach proposes to call a communion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schmid, H. B. (2016). Communal Feelings and Implicit Self-Knowledge. Hermann Schmalenbach on the Nature of the Social Bond. In Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality (Vol. 6, pp. 197–217). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27692-2_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free