The Semiotic Situation of Cassirer

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter endeavors to examine the relationship between science, myth and their common semiotic foundation which has two aspects. The first one is shared by scientific and mythical thinking alike: it is the very existence of semiotic mediations such as linguistic signs and human institutions in general to conceal their role in the construction of reality, be it scientific or mythical. That is the reason why scientific and mythical thinking are being caught in the illusion that semiotic mediations can be disposed of and that reality can be grasped directly “as it is”. But scientific and mythical thinking strongly differ in their way of constructing reality through the concealed power of semiotic mediations: whereas scientific thinking builds a limited knowledge in specific domains expanding through history, mythical thinking keeps an all-encompassing viewpoint on reality that keeps it close to the very source of sense-making but does not develop through time. Philosophy appears therefore as a specific knowledge that takes distance from the illusion of the passive role played by semiotic mediations and reflects on their role in the construction of reality, be it mythical or scientific.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lassègue, J. (2020). The Semiotic Situation of Cassirer. In Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (Vol. 55, pp. 95–101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42905-8_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free