The domain structure and retrotransposition mechanism of R2 elements are conserved throughout arthropods

92Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

R2 elements are non-LTR retrotransposons that insert in the 28S rRNA genes of arthropods. Partial sequence data from many species have previously suggested that these elements have been vertically inherited since the origin of this phylum. Here, we compare the complete sequences of nine R2 elements selected to represent the diversity of arthropods. All of the elements exhibited a uniform structure. Identification of their conserved sequence features, combined with our biochemical studies, allows us to make the following inferences concerning the retrotransposition mechanism of R2. While all R2 elements insert into the identical sequence of the 28S gene, it is only the location of the initial nick in the target DNA that is rigidly conserved across arthropods. Variation at the R2 5' junctions suggests that cleavage of the second strand of the target site is not conserved within or between species. The extreme 5' and 3' ends of the elements themselves are also poorly conserved, consistent with a target primed reverse transcription mechanism for attachment of the 3' end and a template switch model for the attachment of the 5' end. Comparison of the ~ 1,000-aa R2 ORF reveals that it can be divided into three domains. The central 450-aa domain can be folded by homology modeling into a tertiary structure resembling the fingers, palm, and thumb subdomains of retroviral reverse transcriptases. The carboxyl terminal end of the R2 protein appears to be the endonuclease domain, while the amino-terminal end contains zinc finger and c-myb-like DNA-binding motifs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burke, W. D., Malik, H. S., Jones, J. P., & Eickbush, T. H. (1999). The domain structure and retrotransposition mechanism of R2 elements are conserved throughout arthropods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 16(4), 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free