Evidence-based policy responses to strengthen health, community and legislative systems that care for women in Australia with female genital mutilation / cutting

18Citations
Citations of this article
273Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The physical and psychological impact of female genital mutilation / cutting (FGM/C) can be substantial, long term, and irreversible. Parts of the health sector in Australia have developed guidelines in the management of FGM/C, but large gaps exist in community and professional knowledge of the consequences and treatment of FGM/C. The prevalence of FGM/C amongst Australian women is unknown. Our article reviews the literature on research on FGM/C in Australia, which focuses on health system response to women and girls with FGM/C. Recommendations are made for policy reform in health, legislation, and community programs to provide the best healthcare, protect children, and help communities abandon this harmful practice. Main body: Midwives and doctors in Australia acknowledged a lack of knowledge on FGM/C, clinical guidelines and consequences for maternity care. In a metropolitan Australian hospital with specialised FGM/C care, women with FGM/C had similar obstetric outcomes as women without FGM/C, underlining the importance of holistic FGM/C clinics. Greater focus on integration of refugee and migrant populations into their new cultures may be an important way of facilitating the abandonment of this practice, as is education of communities that practise FGM/C, and experts involved in the care and protection of children. Men could be important advocates for protecting women and girls from violence and FGM/C through a man-to-man strategy with programs focussing on men’s health and other personal issues, education, and communication. The Australian Government has identified gender-based violence as an area of priority and has been implementing a National plan to reduce violence against women and their children 2010-2022. A multidisciplinary network of experts on FGM/C could be established within this taskforce to develop well-defined and rapid referral pathways to care for and protect these children, as well as coordinate education and prevention programs to help communities abandon this harmful practice. Conclusion: Countries of migration can be part of the solution for abandonment of FGM/C through community interventions and implementation of national and coordinated training in FGM/C of experts involved in the care and protection of children and women. The global focus on collaboration on research, training and prevention programs should be fostered between countries of FGM/C prevalence and migration.

References Powered by Scopus

Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries

0
461Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating men's involvement as a strategy in sexual and reproductive health promotion

172Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of female genital cutting on health of newly married women

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Understanding Refugees' Health

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring barriers to seeking health care among Kenyan Somali women with female genital mutilation: A qualitative study

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preventing female genital mutilation in high income countries: A systematic review of the evidence

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Varol, N., Hall, J. J., Black, K., Turkmani, S., & Dawson, A. (2017, May 18). Evidence-based policy responses to strengthen health, community and legislative systems that care for women in Australia with female genital mutilation / cutting. Reproductive Health. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0324-3

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 92

74%

Researcher 20

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

6%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 48

36%

Nursing and Health Professions 35

26%

Social Sciences 30

23%

Psychology 20

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0