Do-not-resuscitate order in COVID-19 times: bioethics and professional ethics

1Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To reflect about the do-not-resuscitation order at COVID-19 in Brazil, under bioethical focus and medical and nursing professional ethics. Method: Reflection study based on the principlist bioethics of Beauchamps and Childress and in professional ethics, problematizing actions, and decisions of non-resuscitation in the pandemic. Results: It is important to consider the patient’s clinic, appropriation of treatment goals for people with comorbidities, elderly people, with less chance of surviving to resuscitation, or less quality of life, with the palliative care team, to avoid dysthanasia, use of scarce resources and greater exposure of professionals to contamination. Conclusion: COVID-19 increased the vulnerabilities of professionals and patients, impacting professional decisions and conduct more widely than important values such as the restriction of freedom. It propelled the population in general to rethink ethical and bioethical values regarding life and death, interfering in decisions about them, supported by human dignity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Oliveira, H. C., Sauthier, M., da Silva, M. M., Crespo, M. da C. A., Seixas, A. P. R., & Campos, J. F. (2021). Do-not-resuscitate order in COVID-19 times: bioethics and professional ethics. Revista Gaucha de Enfermagem, 42(special issue). https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free