Paying the Price for Admission: Non-Traditional Marks across Registration and Enforcement

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter makes the case for joined-up thinking when approaching non-traditional signs in trade mark law. Trade mark registration has moved from up-front exclusions for certain categories of signs (no shapes, no colours) toward incremental acceptance. However the policy concerns generated by the grant of legal monopolies in such signs remain equally relevant today. The grant of an abstract color mark to one trader closes off a part of the color spectrum to others. Can we therefore allow such signs in to the system while successfully managing the tensions this generates? The approach advocated here is that we should correlate the mark as characterized at the time of registration-agreeably modest in its scope and ambitions-with the mark as deployed in an enforcement context, where it otherwise tends to be read more generously. The doctrine of prosecution history estoppel in patent law may have valuable lessons for trademark law.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gangjee, D. S. (2019). Paying the Price for Admission: Non-Traditional Marks across Registration and Enforcement. In The Protection of Non-Traditional Trademarks: Critical Perspectives (pp. 59–88). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826576.003.0004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free