Objectives: Comparison of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a combination of enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) and a synthetic bone graft (EMD/SBG) with EMD alone in wide (2 mm) and deep (4 mm) one- and two- wall intra-bony defects 12 months after treatment. Materials and Methods: Seventy-three patients with chronic periodontitis and one wide (2 mm) and deep (4 mm) intra-bony defect were recruited in five centres in Germany. During surgery, defects were randomly assigned to EMD/SBG (test) or EMD (control). Assessments at baseline, after 6 and 12 months included bone sounding, attachment levels, probing pocket depths, bleeding on probing, and recessions. Changes in defect fill were recorded radiographically. Results: Both treatment modalities led to significant clinical improvements. In the EMD/SBG group a mean defect fill of 2.7 ± 1.9 mm was calculated, in the EMD group the defect fill was 2.8 ± 1.6 mm. A mean gain in clinical attachment of 1.7 ± 2.1 mm in the test group and 1.9 ± 1.7 mm in the control group after 1 year was observed. Radiographic analysis confirmed for both groups that deeper defects were associated with greater defect fill. Conclusion: The results show comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes following both treatment modalities 12 months after treatment. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
CITATION STYLE
Meyle, J., Hoffmann, T., Topoll, H., Heinz, B., Al-Machot, E., Jervøe-Storm, P. M., … Jepsen, S. (2011). A multi-centre randomized controlled clinical trial on the treatment of intra-bony defects with enamel matrix derivatives/synthetic bone graft or enamel matrix derivatives alone: Results after 12 months. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 38(7), 652–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01726.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.