Economic Geography, Political Inequality, and Public Goods in the Original 13 U.S. States

5Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A large and fruitful literature has focused on the impact of colonial legacies on long-term development. Yet the mechanisms through which these legacies get transmitted over time remain ambiguous. This article analyzes the choice and effects of legislative representation as one such mechanism, driven by elites interested in maximizing jointly economic prospects and political influence over time. We focus on malapportionment in the legislatures of the original 13 British North-American colonies. Their joint independence created a unique juncture in which postcolonial elites simultaneously chose the legislative and electoral institutions under which they would operate. We show that the initial choice of apportionment in the state legislatures is largely a function of economic geography, that such a choice generated persistent differences in representation patterns within states (political inequality), and that the latter shaped public goods provision in the long run.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beramendi, P., & Jensen, J. (2019). Economic Geography, Political Inequality, and Public Goods in the Original 13 U.S. States. Comparative Political Studies, 52(13–14), 2235–2282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019830741

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free