Evidence-based medicine and rare diseases

5Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter discusses the meaning of evidence-based medicine and where it relates to randomised controlled trials, but also where it does not. The need for good quality evidence is stressed through a discussion of high failure rates in drug development and arguments against access to unlicensed (and largely untested) treatments are set out (despite the good intentions of those who advocate such access to treatments). Good quality, reliable evidence does not always have to come from clinical trials. Other forms of evidence are discussed. Meta-analyses of individual trials may help to resolve the problem that, in rare diseases, it may be very difficult or impossible to do adequately powered clinical trials - but that does not imply those trials have no value at all. The importance of patients’ choices is stressed but the difficulties of making choices and the general poor understanding of risk can make patients and caregivers, as well as healthcare professionals, very vulnerable to making poor decisions. All stakeholders need to be adequately guided through the evidence to make proper informed decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Day, S. (2017). Evidence-based medicine and rare diseases. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (Vol. 1031, pp. 207–220). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free