A KNOWLEDGE GRAPH AND RULE BASED REASONING METHOD FOR EXTRACTING SAPPHIRE INFORMATION FROM TEXT

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Representation of design information using causal ontologies is very effective for creative ideation in product design. Hence researchers created databases with models of engineering and biological systems using causal ontologies. Manually building many models using technical documents requires significant effort by specialists. Researchers worked on the automatic extraction of design information leveraging the computational techniques of Machine Learning. But these methods are data intensive, have manual touch points and have not yet reported the end-to-end performance of the process. In this paper, we present the results of a new method inspired by the cognitive process followed by specialists. This method uses the Knowledge Graph with Rule based reasoning for information extraction for the SAPPhIRE causality model from natural language texts. Unlike the supervised learning methods, this new method does not require data intensive modelling. We report the performance of the end-to-end information extraction process, which is found to be a promising alternative.

References Powered by Scopus

The unreasonable effectiveness of data

1165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Information Extraction

452Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas

390Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A New Entity Relationship Extraction Method for Semi-Structured Patent Documents

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhattacharya, K., & Chakrabarti, A. (2023). A KNOWLEDGE GRAPH AND RULE BASED REASONING METHOD FOR EXTRACTING SAPPHIRE INFORMATION FROM TEXT. In Proceedings of the Design Society (Vol. 3, pp. 221–230). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.23

Readers over time

‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 1

50%

Engineering 1

50%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0