Resolving the battle of short- vs. long-term AI risks

  • Sætra H
  • Danaher J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

AI poses both short- and long-term risks, but the AI ethics and regulatory communities are struggling to agree on how to think two thoughts at the same time. While disagreements over the exact probabilities and impacts of risks will remain, fostering a more productive dialogue will be important. This entails, for example, distinguishing between evaluations of particular risks and the politics of risk. Without proper discussions of AI risk, it will be difficult to properly manage them, and we could end up in a situation where neither short- nor long-term risks are managed and mitigated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sætra, H. S., & Danaher, J. (2023). Resolving the battle of short- vs. long-term AI risks. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00336-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free