Shapeshifting attachment: Exploring multi-dimensional people–place bonds in place-based citizen science

20Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Research on citizen science programmes has highlighted that they can foster science content and knowledge gain, enhance pro-environmental behaviour and cultivate civic action among participants. Especially in the case of place-based citizen science, which requires hands-on repeated activity in an out-of-door setting through a scientific lens, evidence suggests that some of these outcomes may be linked to the unique people–place relationships and interactions afforded by such programmes. Even still, studies that empirically examine the influence of place on citizen science participant and programme outcomes are scant. This is due, in part, to the methodological challenges involved in interrogating complex aspects of a person's sense of place—aspects like place attachment—the emotional bonds between people and place. Here, an adapted three-dimensional model of place attachment is proposed as a theoretical framework from which place-based citizen science experiences and outcomes might be empirically examined in depth. The model, which posits personal, social and natural environment dimensions of place attachment is contextualized with research findings from the US-based Coastal Observation and Seabird Survey Team (COASST) citizen science programme. Data from COASST suggest that participants do exhibit place attachment in all three dimensions of attachment, categorized within seven unique constructs, although questions remain regarding the unique intensity, make-up (shape) and scale (spatial, social and nature-science) of individual-level attachment along the three central dimensions. Critically, more research is needed to investigate whether the unique place attachment ‘profile’ of participants is a function of personal, social or programmatic variables pre- and post-programme participation. To encourage further scholarship on potential links between the experiences, exposures and programme components of place-based citizen science and the place attachment profiles of participants, this paper includes a brief review of the research opportunities presented by the adapted three-dimensional place attachment model discussed. Advancing this line of inquiry is an important component of broader efforts to understand how sense of place is altered via place-based citizen science and whether or not that is linked to specific programme outputs or participant outcomes in science knowledge, ecological understanding and civic engagement. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

References Powered by Scopus

Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?

1832Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework

1721Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy

1680Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Place attachment and digitalisation in rural regions

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characterising potential participants in kelp monitoring in the recreational diving community: A comparative study of South Africa and New Zealand

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A framework for contextualizing social-ecological biases in contributory science data

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haywood, B. K., Parrish, J. K., & He, Y. (2021). Shapeshifting attachment: Exploring multi-dimensional people–place bonds in place-based citizen science. People and Nature, 3(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10174

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

46%

Researcher 7

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 7

37%

Environmental Science 7

37%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

21%

Design 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free