Development of young mixed Norway spruce and Scots pine stands with juvenile stand management in Finland

7Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In Fennoscandia, mixtures of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) are of increasing interest, since they may deliver simultaneously a wide variety of benefits. However, there is still lack of information on how young mixed stands in managed production forests would develop under even-aged management with artificial regeneration of spruce. We inventoried ten such stands (age range: 8–26), with soil properties, tree characteristics, and locations recorded in three plots. In each plot, five sample trees of both species were selected, and their past diameter and height growth were reconstructed through stem analysis. We compared species-specific mean stand parameters, and we modeled the individual tree growth. Spruce and pine had reached similar mean size, with only slight differences. The spatial distribution of the two species was even across the plots. Only 8% and 1%, respectively, of the total pine and spruce trees were damaged, with browsing the most common damage cause (62% for pine). The modeling results suggest that pine had only a small competitive advantage on spruce, and less so in higher fertility sites. Our observations showed that it is possible to develop single-storied pine–spruce mixture with the help of careful management.

Author supplied keywords

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bianchi, S., Huuskonen, S., Hynynen, J., Oijala, T., Siipilehto, J., & Saksa, T. (2021). Development of young mixed Norway spruce and Scots pine stands with juvenile stand management in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 36(5), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2021.1936155

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

75%

Environmental Science 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0