Defining Paternalism

12Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Any definition of a concept is subject to various criteria for a good definition in the context at hand. Unless we are simply stipulating how we shall be using the word – and even then questions will arise about why we picked that word to use for this stipulation – there will be some, usually implicit, ideas of what makes for a good definition. In addition to trivial ones – such as consistency – there will be a set of problems that the definition will be used to clarify or, if possible, resolve. There will be a set of constraints – weak or strong – on how the word is currently being used. There will be a context – perhaps one of personal ethics or perhaps one of current law – in which the concept finds a place. There will be some conceptual or normative issues that will be used to assess the usefulness or correctness of the definition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dworkin, G. (2015). Defining Paternalism. In Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy (Vol. 35, pp. 17–29). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17960-5_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free