Measuring relatedness between inbred individuals

35Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Genetic relatedness between individuals is an important measure in many areas of biology. However, some relatedness measures for use with molecular (allele) data assume that the individuals themselves are not inbred. Here, we present a new measure of relatedness based on the different modes of identity-by-descent for alleles that has an upper bound of 1 even when the individuals being compared are themselves inbred. This new measure is compared to several other measures of relatedness using several simple examples and pedigree data from the wolf population in Isle Royale National Park.

References Powered by Scopus

The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I

10305Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coancestry: A program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients

744Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations

516Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Fast and accurate relatedness estimation from high-throughput sequencing data in the presence of inbreeding

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comparison of pedigree, genetic and genomic estimates of relatedness for informing pairing decisions in two critically endangered birds: Implications for conservation breeding programmes worldwide

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Molecular biomarkers for chronological age in animal ecology

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hedrick, P. P. W., Lacy, R. C., & Baker, C. S. (2015). Measuring relatedness between inbred individuals. Journal of Heredity, 106(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esu072

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 49

60%

Researcher 21

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62

70%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 19

22%

Environmental Science 6

7%

Computer Science 1

1%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free