Seasonal variation of human sperm cells among 4,422 semen samples: A retrospective study in Turkey

26Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We aimed to assess the possible presence of a seasonal pattern in three parameters of semen analysis: sperm concentration, morphology, and motility as a function of the time of ejaculation and sperm production (spermatogenesis) in normal and oligozoospermic men. This retrospective study included a consecutive series of 4,422 semen samples that were collected from patients as a part of the basic evaluation of the infertile couples attending the Reproductive Endocrine Outpatient Clinic of a tertiary women’s hospital in Ankara, Turkey, between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013. The samples were classified according to sperm concentration: ≥15 x106/mL as normozoospermic samples and 4 -14.99 x106/mL as oligozoospermic samples and seasonal analysis of the semen samples were carried out separately. When the data was analyzed according to the season of semen production, there was no seasonal effect on the sperm concentration. A gradual and consistent decrease in the rate of sperm with fast forward motility was observed from spring to fall with a recovery noticed during the winter. The percentage of sperms with normal morphology was found to be statistically significantly higher in the spring samples compared with the summer samples (p=0.001). Both normozoospermic and oligozoospermic semen samples appeared to have better sperm parameters in spring and winter. The circannual variation of semen parameters may be important in diagnosis and treatment desicions. Abbreviations: WHO: World Health Organization; mRNA:messenger ribonucleic acid

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ozelci, R., Yılmaz, S., Dilbaz, B., Akpınar, F., Akdag Cırık, D., Dilbaz, S., & Ocal, A. (2016). Seasonal variation of human sperm cells among 4,422 semen samples: A retrospective study in Turkey. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, 62(6), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2016.1225322

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free