Patient Perceptions of Treatment Benefit and Toxicity in Advanced Cancer: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

  • Patell R
  • Einstein D
  • Miller E
  • et al.
11Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE Prior studies show that many patients receiving palliative cancer therapies misperceive likelihood of cure. Patients' understanding of treatment benefits and risks beyond cure is unknown. We explore patient perceptions of palliative treatment in the novel therapeutic era. METHODS We surveyed patients with advanced solid cancers and their oncologists regarding benefits and risks of palliative therapies. We assessed perceived likelihood of tumor response, survival benefit, symptom palliation, and side effects. We used generalized estimating equations to calculate least squares means of misperception (patient-assessed minus physician-assessed likelihood of benefit), accounting for clustering by physician, and compared the degree of misperception by participant characteristics. RESULTS Of the 119 patients enrolled, median age was 65 years (range, 59-73 years), 55% were male, and 56% had prior treatment. Treatments included chemotherapy (60%), immunotherapy (24%), and targeted therapy (15%). Compared with their oncologists, patients overestimate curability (median misperception, 20%; interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 60), chances of tumor response (median, 20%; IQR, 0 to 40), symptom palliation (median, 10%; IQR, 210 to 30), and survival benefit (median, 20%; IQR, 0 to 40). Toxicity was relatively accurately estimated (median, 0.5%; IQR, 220 to 20). Immunotherapy was associated with higher risk of misperception of tumor response and toxicity. Misperceptions of tumor response and curability did not correlate (r = 0.13, P = .15). CONCLUSION Compared with their oncologists, patients overestimated chances of tumor response, symptom palliation, and survival benefit, but accurately perceived likelihood of toxicity. There was no strong correlation between perception of curability and other goals of therapy. Communication focused on treatment goals alongside risks may reduce misperceptions and facilitate informed choices by patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

References Powered by Scopus

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support

35580Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners

13825Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of cancer immunotherapy toxicity

999Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Perception of prognosis, quality of life, and distress in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toxicities and Quality of Life during Cancer Treatment in Advanced Solid Tumors

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Treatment Patterns and Attrition with Lines of Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in the US

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patell, R., Einstein, D., Miller, E., Dodge, L., Halleck, J., & Buss, M. (2021). Patient Perceptions of Treatment Benefit and Toxicity in Advanced Cancer: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study. JCO Oncology Practice, 17(2), e119–e129. https://doi.org/10.1200/op.20.00517

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

33%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free