The ideal of equal health revisited: Definitions and measures of inequity in health should be better integrated with theories of distributive justice

70Citations
Citations of this article
184Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The past decade witnessed great progress in research on health inequities. The most widely cited definition of health inequity is, arguably, the one proposed by Whitehead and Dahlgren: "Health inequalities that are avoidable, unnecessary, and unfair are unjust." We argue that this definition is useful but in need of further clarification because it is not linked to broader theories of justice. We propose an alternative, pluralist notion of fair distribution of health that is compatible with several theories of distributive justice. Our proposed view consists of the weak principle of health equality and the principle of fair trade-offs. The weak principle of health equality offers an alternative definition of health equity to those proposed in the past. It maintains the all-encompassing nature of the popular Whitehead/Dahlgren definition of health equity, and at the same time offers a richer philosophical foundation. This principle states that every person or group should have equal health except when: (a) health equality is only possible by making someone less healthy, or (b) there are technological limitations on further health improvement. In short, health inequalities that are amenable to positive human intervention are unfair. The principle of fair trade-offs states that weak equality of health is morally objectionable if and only if: (c) further reduction of weak inequality leads to unacceptable sacrifices of average or overall health of the population, or (d) further reduction in weak health inequality would result in unacceptable sacrifices of other important goods, such as education, employment, and social security. © 2009 Norheim and Asada; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The concepts and principles of equity and health

1185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Health disparities and health equity: Concepts and measurement

1055Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A glossary for health inequalities

628Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Understanding the complexities of ethnic-racial socialization processes for both minority and majority groups: A 30-year systematic review

231Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Defining health and health inequalities

199Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Food sovereignty, food security and health equity: A meta-narrative mapping exercise

125Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Norheim, O. F., & Asada, Y. (2009). The ideal of equal health revisited: Definitions and measures of inequity in health should be better integrated with theories of distributive justice. International Journal for Equity in Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-8-40

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 79

61%

Researcher 27

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 17

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 43

41%

Medicine and Dentistry 40

38%

Nursing and Health Professions 12

11%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free