Uniformly minimum variance conditionally unbiased estimation in multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials

17Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials compare several experimental treatments with a control treatment, with poorly performing treatments dropped at interim analyses. This leads to inferential challenges, including the construction of unbiased treatment effect estimators. A number of estimators which are unbiased conditional on treatment selection have been proposed, but are specific to certain selection rules, may ignore the comparison to the control and are not all minimum variance. We obtain estimators for treatment effects compared to the control that are uniformly minimum variance unbiased conditional on selection with any specified rule or stopping for futility.

References Powered by Scopus

Estimation and Accuracy After Model Selection

239Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Testing and estimation in flexible group sequential designs with adaptive treatment selection

180Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Two-stage selection and testing designs for comparative clinical trials

169Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Efficient Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials of Interventions for COVID-19

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physiotherapy rehabilitation for osteoporotic vertebral fracture—a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation (PROVE trial)

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Point estimation for adaptive trial designs I: A methodological review

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stallard, N., & Kimani, P. K. (2018). Uniformly minimum variance conditionally unbiased estimation in multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials. Biometrika, 105(2), 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asy004

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 5

56%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

33%

Mathematics 2

33%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

17%

Engineering 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0