Could an Electronic Person Exist? Robots and Personal Responsibility

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The recent developments in robotics claim for a philosophical approach to the current and future relationship between persons and robots. Our aim is to look for some hints in the facets of the debate in order to define the ontology of these entities which in the long run could make decisions or act autonomously. First, we will question which features human beings and artificial beings share, focusing on the concepts of ‘person’ and ‘legal personality’, investigating the philosophical work of thinkers as Kelsen, Scarpelli, Radin, Wolff and Nèkàm. The urgency of the (philosophical) matter is confirmed by the concept of “electronic person” proposed in the motion that the Committee on Legal Affairs presented for a European Parliament resolution with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics in order to establish rules to arrange the relationship between robots and human beings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stancati, C., & Gallo, G. (2020). Could an Electronic Person Exist? Robots and Personal Responsibility. In Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (Vol. 52, pp. 121–129). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37305-4_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free