A practical guide to surface kinetic Monte Carlo simulations

201Citations
Citations of this article
499Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This review article is intended as a practical guide for newcomers to the field of kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations, and specifically to lattice KMC simulations as prevalently used for surface and interface applications. We will provide worked out examples using the kmos code, where we highlight the central approximations made in implementing a KMC model as well as possible pitfalls. This includes the mapping of the problem onto a lattice and the derivation of rate constant expressions for various elementary processes. Example KMC models will be presented within the application areas surface diffusion, crystal growth and heterogeneous catalysis, covering both transient and steady-state kinetics as well as the preparation of various initial states of the system. We highlight the sensitivity of KMC models to the elementary processes included, as well as to possible errors in the rate constants. For catalysis models in particular, a recurrent challenge is the occurrence of processes at very different timescales, e.g., fast diffusion processes and slow chemical reactions. We demonstrate how to overcome this timescale disparity problem using recently developed acceleration algorithms. Finally, we will discuss how to account for lateral interactions between the species adsorbed to the lattice, which can play an important role in all application areas covered here.

References Powered by Scopus

45396Citations
8535Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
Get full text
123Citations
150Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andersen, M., Panosetti, C., & Reuter, K. (2019). A practical guide to surface kinetic Monte Carlo simulations. Frontiers in Chemistry. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00202

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2503570105140

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 213

74%

Researcher 52

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 18

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 69

29%

Chemical Engineering 63

26%

Materials Science 56

23%

Engineering 52

22%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 29

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0