Neural correlates of phrase rhythm: An EEG study of bipartite vs. Rondo sonata form

14Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper introduces the neural correlates of phrase rhythm. In short, phrase rhythm is the rhythmic aspect of phrase construction and the relationships between phrases. For the sake of establishing the neural correlates, a musical experiment has been designed to induce music-evoked stimuli related to phrase rhythm. Brain activity is monitored through electroencephalography (EEG) by using a brain–computer interface. The power spectral value of each EEG channel is estimated to obtain how power variance distributes as a function of frequency. Our experiment shows statistical differences in theta and alpha bands in the phrase rhythm variations of two classical sonatas, one in bipartite form and the other in rondo form.

References Powered by Scopus

DEAP: A database for emotion analysis; Using physiological signals

3735Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions

795Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EMG contamination of EEG: Spectral and topographical characteristics

541Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Consumer grade brain sensing for emotion recognition

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial neural networks to assess emotional states from brain-computer interface

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Human-avatar symbiosis for the treatment of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia through virtual/augmented reality and brain-computer interfaces

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martínez-Rodrigo, A., Fernández-Sotos, A., Miguel Latorre, J., Moncho-Bogani, J., & Fernández-Caballero, A. (2017). Neural correlates of phrase rhythm: An EEG study of bipartite vs. Rondo sonata form. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2017.00029

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

64%

Researcher 5

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 7

47%

Engineering 3

20%

Psychology 3

20%

Computer Science 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0