After-effects reported by women having follow-up cervical cytology tests in primary care: A cohort study within the TOMBOLA trial

8Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Although it is recognised that some women experience pain or bleeding during a cervical cytology test, few studies have quantified physical after-effects of these tests. Aim: To investigate the frequency, severity, and duration of after-effects in women undergoing follow-up cervical cytology tests, and to identify subgroups with higher frequencies in Grampian, Tayside, and Nottingham. Design: Cohort study nested with amulti-centre individually randomised controlled trial. Method : The cohort included 1120 women, aged 20-59 years, with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology who completed a baseline sociodemographic questionnaire and had a follow-up cervical cytology test in primary care 6months later. Six weeks after this test, women completed a postal questionnaire on pain, bleeding, and discharge experienced after the test, including duration and severity. The adjusted prevalence of each after-effect was computed using logistic regression. Results : A total of 884 women (79%) completed the aftereffects questionnaire; 30%of women experienced one ormore after-effect: 15% reported pain, 16%bleeding, and 7%discharge. The duration of discharge was &λε;2 days for 66%, 3-6 days for 22%, and &γε;7 days for 11%of women. Pain or bleeding lasted &λε;2 days inmore than 80%of women. Severe after-effects were reported by <1%of women. The prevalence of pain decreased with increasing age. Bleeding wasmore frequent among nulliparous women. Discharge wasmore common among oral contraceptive users. Conclusion : Pain, bleeding, and discharge are not uncommon in women having follow-up cervical cytology tests. Informing women about possible after-effects could better prepare themand provide reassurance, therebyminimising potential non-adherence with follow-up or nonparticipation with screening in the future. ©British Journal of General Practice.

References Powered by Scopus

Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: A population-based survey

216Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Psychological effects of a low-grade abnormal cervical smear test result: Anxiety and associated factors

94Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

After-effects reported by women following colposcopy, cervical biopsies and LLETZ: Results from the TOMBOLA trial

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Clinical application of DNA ploidy to cervical cancer screening: A review

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The unintended consequences of cervical screening: Distress in women undergoing cytologic surveillance

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Psychosocial impact of alternative management policies for low-grade cervical abnormalities: Results from the tombola randomised controlled trial

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cotton, M. S., Sharp, L., Cochran, C., Gray, N., Cruickshank, M., Smart, L., … Little, J. (2011). After-effects reported by women having follow-up cervical cytology tests in primary care: A cohort study within the TOMBOLA trial. British Journal of General Practice, 61(587). https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X578007

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

14%

Researcher 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

53%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

33%

Chemistry 1

7%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free