Evaluation of green alternatives for blockchain proof-of-work (Pow) approach

12Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Following the footprints of Bitcoins, many other cryptocurrencies were developed mostly adopting the same or similar Proof-of-Work (PoW) approach. Since completing the PoW puzzle requires extremely high computing power, consuming a vast amount of electricity, PoW has been strongly criticised for its anti thetic stand against the notion of green computing. Use of application-specific hardware, particularly application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) has further fuelled the debate, as these devices are of no use once they become “legacy” and hence obsolete to compete in the mining race, thus contributing to electronics waste. Therefore, this paper surveys the currently available alternative approaches to PoW and evaluates their applicability-especially their appropriateness in terms of greenness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miraz, M. H., Excell, P. S., & Sobayel, K. (2021). Evaluation of green alternatives for blockchain proof-of-work (Pow) approach. Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing. International Association for Educators and Researchers (IAER). https://doi.org/10.33166/AETIC.2021.04.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free