Ideological differences between america and china from perspectives of transitivity system —illustrated by trump’s and xi jinping’s presidential inaugural addresses

3Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Taking Systemic Functional Grammar proposed by M.A.K. Halliday as theoretical framework, this paper is set to quantitatively analyze Donald Trump’s inaugural address and Xi Jinping’s first public speech as president of China in the distribution and functions of six processes from perspectives of transitivity system. Having done this, ideological differences between America and China beneath the textual discourse of their speeches will be qualitatively illustrated. It finds that material, mental and relational processes predominate both speeches and Xi’s speech mainly takes the overall lead in spiritual guidance and inclines to generally control the economic and social development in China. For Trump, he needs to employ all his skill to induce and gain the supports from American people, objectively depicting American mediocre situations by material process, trying to narrow down the psychological distance between his governance and the people by mental process and increasing the belonging of American people by relational process.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Transitivity and mystification in a contemporary discourse analysis of trump’s inaugural address

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CHINA'S STRATEGIC NARRATIVES IN RELATIONS WITH THE US, THE EU, AND THE RF

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liao, G., & Han, G. (2019). Ideological differences between america and china from perspectives of transitivity system —illustrated by trump’s and xi jinping’s presidential inaugural addresses. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 800–806. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1004.16

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

44%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 4

40%

Linguistics 4

40%

Social Sciences 1

10%

Psychology 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free