Association of hospice agency profit status with patient diagnosis, location of care, and length of stay

99Citations
Citations of this article
121Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Context: Medicare's per diem payment structure may create financial incentives to select patients who require less resource-intensive care and have longer hospice stays. For-profit and nonprofit hospices may respond differently to financial incentives. Objective: To compare patient diagnosis and location of care between for-profit and nonprofit hospices and examine whether number of visits per day and length of stay vary by diagnosis and profit status. Design, Setting, and Patients: Cross-sectional study using data from the 2007 National Home and Hospice Care Survey. Nationally representative sample of 4705 patients discharged from hospice. Main Outcome Measures: Diagnosis and location of care (home, nursing home, hospital, residential hospice, or other) by hospice profit status. Hospice length of stay and number of visits per day by various hospice personnel. Results: For-profit hospices (1087 discharges from 145 agencies), compared with non-profit hospices (3618 discharges from 524 agencies), had a lower proportion of patients with cancer (34.1%; 95% CI, 29.9%-38.6%, vs 48.4%; 95% CI, 45.0%-51.8%) and a higher proportion of patients with dementia (17.2%; 95% CI, 14.1%-20.8%, vs 8.4%; 95% CI, 6.6%-10.6%) and other noncancer diagnoses (48.7%; 95% CI, 43.2%-54.1%, vs 43.2%; 95% CI, 40.0%-46.5%; adjusted P

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

120Citations
56Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wachterman, M. W., Marcantonio, E. R., Davis, R. B., & McCarthy, E. P. (2011). Association of hospice agency profit status with patient diagnosis, location of care, and length of stay. JAMA, 305(5), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.70

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 40

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

19%

Researcher 13

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 37

53%

Social Sciences 17

24%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

14%

Psychology 6

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 23

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0