Killing Them ‘Softly’ (!): Exploring Work Experiences in Care-Based Animal Dirty Work

16Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Working with animals is a daily occurrence for millions of people who often complete tasks which are tainted, in spite of the work being seen as essential in modern society. Animal shelter-work is such an occupation. This article contributes to a deeper understanding of the caring–killing paradox (a dissonance that workers face when killing animals they are also caring for), through an insider ethnographic study. We find that care-based animal dirty work consists of unique ambiguities and tensions related to powerlessness, deception and secrecy in the work based on a ‘processing-plant’ framework which informs how workers deal with unwanted animals. We find competing ideologies of care and control to be foundational in this work.

References Powered by Scopus

How can you do it?: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity

1205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work

848Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A participatory inquiry paradigm

742Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Human–Animal Relations in Business and Society: Advancing the Feminist Interpretation of Stakeholder Theory

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Animal activism in the business school: Using fierce compassion for teaching critical and positive perspectives

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Psychological implications of humane endings on the veterinary profession

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tallberg, L., & Jordan, P. J. (2022). Killing Them ‘Softly’ (!): Exploring Work Experiences in Care-Based Animal Dirty Work. Work, Employment and Society, 36(5), 858–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211008715

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

56%

Researcher 4

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 4

29%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

29%

Social Sciences 3

21%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

21%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 28

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free