On 'informationally robust equilibria' for bimatrix games

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Informationally robust equilibria (IRE) are introduced in Robson (Games Econ Behav 7: 233-245, 1994) as a refinement of Nash equilibria for strategic games. Such equilibria are limits of a sequence of (subgame perfect) Nash equilibria in perturbed games where with small probability information about the strategic behavior is revealed to other players (information leakage). Focusing on bimatrix games, we consider a type of informationally robust equilibria and derive a number of properties they form a non-empty and closed subset of the Nash equilibria. Moreover, IRE is a strict concept in the sense that the IRE are independent of the exact sequence of probabilities with which information is leaked. The set of IRE, like the set of Nash equilibria, is the finite union of polytopes. In potential games, there is an IRE in pure strategies. In zero-sum games, the set of IRE has a product structure and its elements can be computed efficiently by using linear programming. We also discuss extensions to games with infinite strategy spaces and more than two players. © Springer-Verlag 2006.

References Powered by Scopus

Integer and combinatorial optimization

4246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Potential games

3356Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games

1855Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Fall back proper equilibrium

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Continuity and equilibrium stability

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reijnierse, H., Borm, P., & Voorneveld, M. (2007). On “informationally robust equilibria” for bimatrix games. Economic Theory, 30(3), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-005-0076-0

Readers over time

‘13‘17‘18‘2301234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

67%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0