Learning pain from emotion: Transferred HoT data representation for pain intensity estimation

34Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Automatic monitoring for the assessment of pain can significantly improve the psychological comfort of patients. Recently introduced databases with expert annotation opened the way for pain intensity estimation from facial analysis. In this contribution, pivotal face elements are identified using theHistograms of Topographical features (HoT) which are a generalization of the topographical primal sketch. In order to improve the discrimination between different pain intensity values and respectively the generalization with respect to the monitored persons, we transfer data representation from the emotion oriented Cohn-Kanade database to the UNBC McMaster Shoulder Pain database.

References Powered by Scopus

Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints

50228Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection

30670Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)

12773Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Deep Pain: Exploiting Long Short-Term Memory Networks for Facial Expression Classification

180Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network Regression for Continuous Pain Intensity Estimation in Video

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Investigating Bias in Facial Analysis Systems: A Systematic Review

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Florea, C., Florea, L., & Vertan, C. (2015). Learning pain from emotion: Transferred HoT data representation for pain intensity estimation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8927, pp. 778–790). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16199-0_54

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

62%

Researcher 5

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 9

50%

Engineering 5

28%

Psychology 3

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free