Morph & Slerp: Shape description for 3D printing of concrete

9Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Synthesis of shapes that are guaranteed to be physically produced by Robotic 3D printing of concrete, needs research attention. This is necessitated by the rapid development of the hardware, commercial availability of and interest in concrete printing. Further the need is amplified by the lack of easy-to-implement-and-use shape-design tools. Together, they provide the context of the proposed work. A necessary feature for geometries to be printable' is that each consecutive layer onto which material is deposited should change gradually such that it has sufficient overlap with the preceding layer (spatial coherence of print paths). The computational handling of these aspects have been introduced by Bhooshan et al. (2018) including the use of a time evolving scalar-field to represent the shape to be designed - the so-called Function Representation (FRep). This paper significantly extends the previous work by (a) fully parametrising the shape description for 3D printing of concrete by decomposing the shape as a combination of shape interpolation (Morph) and affine interpolation (Slerp), and (b) replacing the linear, cross-fading interpolation scheme resulting in physically problematic artefacts with a scheme that produces smooth, spatially coherent outcomes. An easy-to-implement software application has been prototyped. It couples the shape description with a guiding heuristic to design topologically complex, physically plausible shapes with relative ease. Thecoupling significantly reduces the effort and expertise needed to produce shapes that are printablewhilst also providing intuitive, visual feedback to designers. This is particularly useful in the current context where computer simulation of the stability of the layers during printing is activelybeing developed, experimental in nature and still computationally expensive. The presented approachdoes not, however, automatically guarantee printable outputs. The shape description and outputs may, nonetheless, be readily used as good candidates for further optimisation to guarantee print readiness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhooshan, S., Van Mele, T., & Block, P. (2020). Morph & Slerp: Shape description for 3D printing of concrete. In Proceedings - SCF 2020: ACM Symposium on Computational Fabrication. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3424630.3425413

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free