The value of a screen and treat policy for chlamydia trachomatis in women attending for termination of pregnancy

6Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We aimed to assess the efficacy of a screen and treat policy for sexually transmitted infections in women requesting termination of pregnancy, with particular reference to Chlamydia trachomatis. A retrospective review of 100 consecutive cases of Chlamydia-positive women between December 1995 and February 1998, was performed. The referral rate to genitourinary medicine (GUM), the subsequent management, contact tracing and treatment of partners were assessed. Ninety-nine women were referred to the GUM department, of whom 72 (71.4%) attended. Eighteen (25%) required further treatment. Seventy-five women identified 89 potentially infected men, of whom 62 (69%) attended for treatment. Identification of positive cases with referral to GUM enabled tests of cure to be carried out, treatment of those re-infected and re-enforcement of behaviour modification, in addition to successful contact tracing. This policy may confer greater benefit for the patient herself and make a significant impact on the reservoir of infection in the community when compared to a policy of blanket prophylactic antibiotic treatment at the time of termination. The implications for future service provision are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Groom, T. M., Stewart, P., Kruger, H., & Bell, G. (2001). The value of a screen and treat policy for chlamydia trachomatis in women attending for termination of pregnancy. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health, 27(2), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1783/147118901101195272

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free