Sub-ADC Architectures for Time-interleaved ADCs

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Chapter 3 discusses the architecture of the sub-ADCs, which are used in the time-interleaved ADC. A Successive Approximation ADC (SA-ADC) can have a very good power efficiency, its sample-rate is however limited. In a conventional SA-ADC, the sample-rate is mainly limited by settling of the DAC. Overrange techniques can reduce the required DAC settling time. A new overrange technique is presented called the single-sided overrange technique. Compared to a conventional SA-ADC, it saves 58% of the settling time, and therefore it can be more energy efficient. By using multiple comparators with different accuracies in an SA-ADC with overrange, power can be saved. Look-ahead logic removes the delay of the logic out of the SA-ADC loop and increases the maximum sample-rate. An efficiency comparison between an SA-ADC and a pipeline ADC is made, based on the power consumption of comparators and opamps. For the same specifications, an SA-ADC can use roughly 10 times less power. This conclusion is supported by literature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Louwsma, S., van Tuijl, E., & Nauta, B. (2011). Sub-ADC Architectures for Time-interleaved ADCs. In Analog Circuits and Signal Processing (pp. 39–69). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9716-3_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free